data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8f0fa/8f0fad1f99a52c43b2736eb8c2f7346a2c861260" alt="does-the-physical-exam-serve-any-other-purpose- image0"
To set this up, not long ago, a group of us were discussing putting sinks in some new exam rooms. The debate was around the need for sinks, how much patient contact occurs, and so forth. At the conclusion of the discussion, we ended up putting the sinks in the rooms. A good decision, I thought. I mention this because of a recent piece in the New York Times, which caught my eye. It was written by Danielle Ofri, M.D., Ph.D. She is a writer, editor and practicing internist in New York City. In her article, she talks about the benefits of patient contact and listening to his heart and lungs. She wrote:
“Does the physical exam serve any other purpose? The doctor-patient relationship is fundamentally different from, say, the accountant-client relationship. The laying on of hands sets medical practitioners apart from their counterparts in the business world. Despite the inroads of evidence-based medicine, MRIs, angiograms and PET scanners, there is clearly something special, perhaps even healing, about touch. There is a warmth of connection that supersedes anything intellectual, and that connection goes both ways in the doctor-patient relationship.”